roundtable: Re: OP-ED ON TV - PUBLIC

roundtable: Re: OP-ED ON TV / PUBLIC

Re: OP-ED ON TV / PUBLIC

Conal L Hession (esquire@creighton.edu)
Wed, 18 Jan 1995 11:20:40 -0600 (CST) 

Date: Wed, 18 Jan 1995 11:20:40 -0600 (CST)
From: Conal L Hession <esquire@creighton.edu>
To: roundtable@cni.org
Subject: Re: OP-ED ON TV / PUBLIC
In-Reply-To: <9501170757.AA27562@athena.capital.edu>
Message-Id: <Pine.HPP.3.91.950118111322.25303A-100000@bluejay.creighton.edu>


I find the most interesting responses to Jack Keith's posting 
floating loose.

Jack: I agree, we waste time engaging in meaningless exchanges of 
rhetoric over the virtues and values of capitalism, socialism and other 
diverse approaches instead of staying focused. However, as Jeff points 
out the discussion, in itself, is valuable, if not productive.

I think our problem is that we have not been able to agree on what the 
problem, solution, goal or answer is.  Many do not wish to agree and 
prefer to argue.  At this point, I've forgotten the question.  On 
looking at the oft-used "re:" line I'm hard pressed to remember. . . .

Conal L Hession
<esquire@creighton.edu>

[CNI Home Page]