roundtable: Re: OP-ED ON TV - PUBLIC

roundtable: Re: OP-ED ON TV / PUBLIC

Re: OP-ED ON TV / PUBLIC

Brad Cox (bcox@gmu.edu)
Thu, 19 Jan 1995 23:09:28 -0500

Messages sorted by: [ date ][ thread ][ subject ][ author ]
Next message: Matt York: "New Web Site for Independant Videomakers"
Previous message: David Farber: "Re: The planned Communications Act Re-write of the New(t) Congress"
Maybe in reply to: Michael G. Koopman: "OP-ED ON TV / PUBLIC"
Next in thread: Jeff Briggs: "Re: OP-ED ON TV / PUBLIC"

Message-Id: <v02110101ab44e6da1beb@[192.0.1.2]>
Date: Thu, 19 Jan 1995 23:09:28 -0500
To: roundtable@cni.org
From: bcox@gmu.edu (Brad Cox)
Subject: Re: OP-ED ON TV / PUBLIC


jbriggs@capital.edu (Jeff Briggs) wrote
> 
>     Nor is it a preference for arguing. We can all agree (can
>we not) that some large dollop of public access communications
>space should be available in the future technology.


I wouldn't take even that much for granted. The public good doesn't 
have the appeal it once did.

--
Brad Cox, Ph.D.; bcox@gmu.edu; Program on Social and Organizational Learning
Phone: (703) 968-8229 Fax: 934-1578  Web: mail listproc@www0.cern.ch
http://gopher.gmu.edu/bcox as the mail body

Next message: Matt York: "New Web Site for Independant Videomakers"
Previous message: David Farber: "Re: The planned Communications Act Re-write of the New(t) Congress"
Maybe in reply to: Michael G. Koopman: "OP-ED ON TV / PUBLIC"
Next in thread: Jeff Briggs: "Re: OP-ED ON TV / PUBLIC"