roundtable: ALLIANCE FILES FCC VDT COMMENTS
roundtable: ALLIANCE FILES FCC VDT COMMENTS
ALLIANCE FILES FCC VDT COMMENTS
AllianceCM@aol.com
Thu, 23 Mar 1995 11:53:26 -0500
Date: Thu, 23 Mar 1995 11:53:26 -0500
From: AllianceCM@aol.com
Message-Id: <950323115044_58629941@aol.com>
To: ROUNDTABLE@cni.org
Subject: ALLIANCE FILES FCC VDT COMMENTS
March 21, 1995
CONTACT: Barry Forbes
(202) 393-2650
VIDEO DIALTONE IS AN END-RUN AROUND CIVIC
RESPONSIBILITY SAYS PUBLIC INTEREST COALITION IN FCC
FILING
Washington DC, March 21 -- The Alliance for Community Media and
Office of Communication of the United Church of Christ today stated
that telephone company provision of video services is nothing more
than "a bald attempt to do an end run around the public interest
requirements of Title VI of the Communications Act." The Alliance and
the United Church of Christ, filing as the "PEG Access Coalition,"
joined a number of public interest groups, regional and long-distance
telephone companies, cable operators, television networks, trade
associations, policymakers and scholars who have participated in the
Federal Communications Commission's (FCC's) request for information
and comments for the FCC's "Video Dialtone" docket. In this latest
round of the FCC's ongoing efforts to regulate new entry into the
provision of video services, the PEG Access Coalition called for an
entirely new telecommunications policy which (1) explicitly recognizes
the need to include individuals and local community groups in new
communications technologies and (2) treats all providers of wire-based
video services equally.
"The term "video dialtone" (VDT) was created by the FCC as a
smokescreen to allow telephone companies to get into the cable
television business -- without the same responsibilities to local
communities. Now that many jurisdictions have recognized the cable-
telephone cross-ownership ban to be constitutionally suspect, this
fiction has been exposed. VDT is just cable television by another name.
Radically different regulatory structures should not be based on nothing
more than an arbitrary variant in terminology," said Barry Forbes,
Executive Director of the Alliance.
"This artificial separation between Title II common carrier
companies and Title VI cable companies forces the Commission -- and
those companies regulated by the Commission -- to make specious
choices between different types of rules," said Forbes. "The Commission
has categorized VDT as common carrier service in order to allow non-
discriminatory access for third-party programmers. However, leased
access is already available on cable television and a minor change of
the law could provide for wider opportunities for third-party
programmers under Title VI. Creating a new regime when current
regulations offer similar opportunities relieves Bell operating
companies of the responsibilities to local communities that cable
companies now have."
"The current cable television regulations allow for public,
educational and government access," Forbes stated. "Cable companies
use public rights-of-way -- streets, roads, parks -- to lay video cable.
They generally pay for that use of these property rights by supporting
PEG access to the communities they serve. We believe that VDT
providers should be governed by exactly the same requirements -- and
the law is unequivocal about that," Forbes stated. "In suggesting a new
telecommunications regime to Congress, the FCC must consider the needs
of the hundreds of thousands of churches, charities, YMCAs,
elementary schools, libraries, Little Leagues that use public,
educational and governmental ("PEG") access cable channels. If they
don't, they might inadvertently create rules that would put these
channels out of business entirely. I am concerned that there is not an
awareness among the Commission about how many local communities
have become dependent on PEG access. What the FCC is contemplating
is the equivalent of giving away public land for strip-mining -- without
creating a single public park for all to use."
Anthony Pharr, Director of Communication for the United Church of
Christ, expressed similar concerns. "It is essential that PEG access
flourish, rather than perish, at the dawn of the era of the "information
superhighway." Religious communities rely heavily on PEG access to
get their message out to their congregations and families."
In 1991, the FCC decided that phone companies that provide video
services are not required to obtain franchises from their local
communities, as is required of cable operators under the 1984 Cable Act.
The FCC reasoned that phone companies were not allowed to offer
their own programming, according to the terms of the telco-cable cross-
ownership restrictions. The District of Columbia Circuit Court of
Appeals upheld the FCC's rulemaking in August of last year.
Multiple federal courts have now declared cable-telephone
company cross-ownership rules to be unconstitutional, but since that
time have not determined whether phone companies entering the video
programming industry should be regulated as phone companies or cable
companies.
"To us, the choice is clear," said Forbes. "The law and previous FCC
rulemakings state that anyone offering direct video programming
services is a cable operator. It's cut and dried. Putting VDT under cable
regulation means that cities get compensated for use of the public
property that they manage, citizens can continue to participate in
democratic discourse, and viewers get a greater diversity of information
and opinion. Putting VDT under telephone company regulation will
diminish local determinism, will offer a select group of companies
special privileges over their competitors, and will further restrict
citizens' and nonprofits' ability to participate in the information
superhighway. The potential of a democratic electronic forum will
degenerate into the reality of a high-rent strip-mall."
The PEG Access Coalition is hopeful that this new round of
rulemaking will spur the FCC to impose franchise-like requirements on
VDT services, because of the clear threat that the current legal regime
poses to the future of PEG access and local control of public-rights-of-
way.
"The FCC's rule exempting VDT from franchise requirements, when
combined with the decisions of the six federal district and three Circuit
courts that decided that cable-telco cross ownership rules are
unconstitutional, could potentially create a deadly mixture for the
citizens and small community groups that depend on PEG access," stated
Forbes. "The economic pressures that large-scale VDT entry will put on
cable could persuade cable operators that the community services
provided by PEG are too expensive an amenity for a competitive
marketplace. Clearly, convergence in technology must be matched by
convergence in the law."
The Alliance for Community Media is a national, non-profit
membership organization committed to assuring everyone's access to
electronic media. The Alliance accomplishes this by disseminating
public information, advancing a positive legislative and regulatory
environment, building coalitions, and supporting local organizing.
Founded in 1976, the Alliance represents the interests of over 950 public,
educational and governmental ("PEG") access organizations and local
origination cable services throughout the country. The Alliance also
represents the interests of local religious, community, charitable and
other organizations throughout the country who utilize PEG access
channels and facilities to speak to their memberships and their larger
communities.
- 30 -
_________________________________________________
National Office Alliance for Community Media
666 11th Street, NW, Suite 806
Washington, DC 20001-4542
Voice: (202) 393-2650
Fax: (202) 393-2653
E-mail: AllianceCM@aol.com
"Ensuring everyone's access to electronic media since 1976."
Barry Forbes, Executive Director
"Do what's right. Do it right. Do it right now."
_________________________________________________