roundtable: RE: SEN. ROBERT DOLE, SP

roundtable: RE: SEN. ROBERT DOLE, SP

RE: SEN. ROBERT DOLE, SP

Vigdor Schreibman - FINS (fins@access.digex.net)
Tue, 13 Jun 1995 20:52:34 -0400 (EDT) 

Date: Tue, 13 Jun 1995 20:52:34 -0400 (EDT)
From: Vigdor Schreibman - FINS <fins@access.digex.net>
To: roundtable@cni.org
Subject: RE: SEN. ROBERT DOLE, SP
In-Reply-To: <9506131002.0E3RM0B@his.com>
Message-Id: <Pine.SUN.3.91.950613203827.12673A-100000@access4.digex.net>


On Tue, 13 Jun 1995 jack@his.com wrote:
> 
> Vigdor Schreibman writes:
> > "There is hypocracy in this situation, I would be the last to deny
> > that.  But I think the better way to go is to give credence where it
> > is plausible and keep close watch over the issue to see if the politifal
> > wind blows in a different direction later on.  If that occurs in this
> > issue you can be certain I will be covering that story vigorously."
> 
> Vigdor, you are indeed a man of principle.  Personally, the evidence 
> of Dole's opportunism - which stretches back across half my lifetime 
> and more - is clear enough to me to deny credence to any utterance of 
> his, and to focus instead on the political context.

  Maybe Jack would share with us some of his lifetime experience and 
indicate just why that context entirely disqualifies Sen. Dole from 
making any mere utterance denouncing violence on television.  This is 
an indication that people would cndemn  any speech by that individual, 
and perhaps, oppose any of his ideas, including those that are of 
urgent significance and great benefit to humanity.

  What could Dole have done, which remains entirely without explicit 
description and is beyond my own understanding, which warrants such a 
position?   

  Vigdor Schreibman 
  <fins@access.digex.net>

[CNI Home Page]