roundtable: US SENATE APPROPRIATIONS BILL MARKUP
roundtable: US SENATE APPROPRIATIONS BILL MARKUP
US SENATE APPROPRIATIONS BILL MARKUP
Vigdor Schreibman - FINS (fins@access.digex.net)
Wed, 19 Jul 1995 13:51:47 -0400 (EDT)
Date: Wed, 19 Jul 1995 13:51:47 -0400 (EDT)
From: Vigdor Schreibman - FINS <fins@access.digex.net>
To: Vigdor Schreibman - FINS <fins@access.digex.net>
Subject: US SENATE APPROPRIATIONS BILL MARKUP
Message-Id: <Pine.SUN.3.91.950719134943.25210F-100000@access1.digex.net>
==============================================================================
FINS SPECIAL REPORT July 19, 1995
==============================================================================
US SENATE APPROPRIATIONS BILL MARKUP
Triumph & Disaster
Washington, DC--The US Senate Appropriations Committee Chairman Mark O.
Hatfield released funding allocations for the 13 subcommittees, including
Legislative Branch appropriations for 1996, which were approved during a
markup by the committee yesterday July 18, on a vote of 25 yeas to 3 nays.
The vote without discussion of legislative branch matters pertaining to
the library and information community was a triumph for that community, in
the midst of an emerging budgetary confrontation between the White House
and Congress. The President has already issued his response with a stark
veto message, attached below.
During the markup, the Committee decided after heated argument to
terminate the Office of Technology Assessment, rejecting by a vote of 11
yeas to 13 nays, a proposed amendment by Sen. Ernest Hollings (D-SC) that
would have kept the OTA alive under a plan or reorganization. However,
the Committee agreed to restore most of the funding requested by the
Government Printing Office and the Superintendent of Documents, depository
library program, after a strong lobbying effort by librarians
The Committee recommended an appropriation of $85.5 million for the GPO,
which is $6.1 million below the request, and $2.8 million below the House
allowance. However, the draft Committee report for Legislative Branch
Appropriations, 1996 obtained by FINS, rejected the House report relative
to constituent copies and bylaw distribution of the Congressional Record;
the distribution of copies of bills, reports, and other documents to
noncongressional recipients; Statutes at Large; paper copies of hearings;
special binding of congressional documents; and the production and
distribution of the bound Congressional Record and the bound serial set.
The Committee also recommended an appropriation for the SuDocs Salaries
and Expense fund of $30,3 million, which is $13.9 million above the House
allowance. The Committee stated that it "does not agree with the House
recommendation relative to assumption of costs [by agencies] associated with
the production and distribution of publication in paper or microfiche
formats. The Committee characterized the House proposal as an "amendment
to title 44 of the U.S. Code [that] more properly falls within the
jurisdiction of the Joint Committee on Printing."
Finally, this statement affirming the historical information role of
Congress was included in the draft report:
Public access to government information is a basic right of every
American citizen. The Committee recognizes the critically important
service that the Government Printing Office and participating libraries
in the Federal Depository Library Program provide to citizens
throughout the country in furnishing timely, equitable access to
Government information.
The dramatic advances in technology provide new opportunities for
enhancing and improving public access. However, the increasing
utilization of electronic technologies in support of dissemination
programs by all branches of government requires careful analysis,
planning, and probable restructuring of the current program. Without
this analysis, planning, and a strongly coordinated effort,
improvements to the program will be delayed, costly, and very well may
compromise the public's right to Government information.
The Committee believes the planning should incorporate the goals of
equitable, efficient, timely, and dependable access to Government
information. The Committee supports a strong coordinated effort
between the respective oversight and appropriation committee, the
Government Printing Office, executive branch agencies, participating
depository libraries, and other relevant and appropriate organizations.
To this end, the Committee directs the Public Printer to initiate a
study that:
-Examines the functions and services of the Federal Depository
Library Program;
-Surveys current technological capabilities of the participating
libraries in the Federal Depository Library Program;
-Surveys current and future information dissemination plans of
executive branch agencies;
-Examines and suggests improvements for agency compliance of relevant
laws, regulations and policies regarding Government information
dissemination;
- Identifies measures that are necessary to ensure a successful
transition to a more electronically based program;
-Identifies the possible expansion of the array of Federal
information products and services made available to participating
libraries; and
-Ensures the most cost-efficient program to the taxpayer.
The Appropriations Committee also recommented that the study "include a
strategic plan that will assist the Congress in redefining a new and
strengthened Federal information dissemination policy and program" and
ordered the study to be available to Congress by March 1996.
Sen. Connie Mack (R-FL), Chairman of the Subcommittee on Legislative
Branch Appropriations, provided FINS with a word of caution after the
markup, indicating that "this recommendation remains subject to the outcome
of a Senate-House conference."
Vigdor Schreibman - FINS <fins@access.digex.net>
-------------------------------------------------
THE WHITE HOUSE
Office of the Press Secretary
________________________________________________________________________
For Immediate Release July 18, 1995
STATEMENT BY THE PRESIDENT
The 1996 VA-HUD appropriations bill passed today by the House
Appropriations Committee is unacceptable.
By abolishing Americorps it would eliminate opportunities for
thousands of young people to serve their communities through the
national service program. By dramatically slashing resources for the
Environmental Protection Agency and imposing severe restrictions on that
agency, the bill would decimate the government's ability to protect the
American people from air and water pollution. By cutting assistance for
the nation's homeless in half, it would punish some of the weakest and
most vulnerable in our society.
We need to balance the budget, and we need to cut spending to do
it. But there is a right way and a wrong way. A bill so contrary to
the priorities and concerns of the American people clearly represents
the wrong way.
I will not stand by as the Republican majority tries to impose this
extreme agenda on the nation. If this bill is presented to me in its
current form, I will veto it. I call on the Congress to correct the
appropriations bills now under consideration before they reach my desk,
not after.
-30-30-30-