Re: APT Section 706 Filing

Subject: Re: APT Section 706 Filing
Craig A. Johnson (caj@tdrs.com)
Date: Mon, 15 Jun 1998 14:20:53 -0400

• Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]

Message-Id: <199806151813.OAA22933@ice.clark.net>
Date: Mon, 15 Jun 1998 14:20:53 -0400
To: roundtable@cni.org
From: "Craig A. Johnson" <caj@tdrs.com>
Subject: Re: APT Section 706 Filing
In-Reply-To: <3.0.3.32.19980612110952.006b82f4@postoffice.att.net>
References: <1.5.4.32.19980612014813.006cfd18@pop.mindspring.com>

On 6/12/98, John Schwartz <schwartz@usa.net> wrote:
>
> I posted several follow-up questions to APT concerning its positions
> as expressed in the Section 706 filing. I have yet to get a response,
> either privately or via this list.

I'm still interested in hearing the answers to these questions, as well
as the ones that Chris Savage posed.

Anyone from APT out there that would kindly address these?

Thanks,

Craig

Craig A. Johnson
<caj@tdrs.com>

This archive was generated by hypermail 2a16 : Tue Mar 23 1999 - 03:33:26 EST