Subject: Re: APT Section 706 Filing
Mark J. Huisman (cinemark@mindspring.com)
Date: Tue, 16 Jun 1998 00:10:38 -0400
Message-Id: <1.5.4.32.19980616041038.006ded08@pop.mindspring.com> Date: Tue, 16 Jun 1998 00:10:38 -0400 To: roundtable@cni.org From: "Mark J. Huisman" <cinemark@mindspring.com> Subject: Re: APT Section 706 Filing
On 6/15/98, Craig A. Johnson <caj@tdrs.com> wrote:
>
> On 6/12/98, John Schwartz <schwartz@usa.net> wrote:
> >
> > I posted several follow-up questions to APT concerning its positions
> > as expressed in the Section 706 filing. I have yet to get a response,
> > either privately or via this list.
>
> I'm still interested in hearing the answers to these questions, as well
> as the ones that Chris Savage posed.
>
> Anyone from APT out there that would kindly address these?
Hello, APT? I've also called your offices about these questions and
nobody's called me back, either. This isn't the way to further the
debate, folks.
Mark J. Huisman
335 Greenwich Street, 14B
New York, New York 10013.3325
(212) 431-7601 (v oice/fax)
cinemark@mindspring.com
This archive was generated by hypermail 2a16 : Tue Mar 23 1999 - 03:33:26 EST