roundtable: New Delhi Declaration
roundtable: New Delhi Declaration
New Delhi Declaration
Howard Frederick (hfrederick@igc.apc.org)
Wed, 2 Mar 1994 05:10:53 -0800
Date: Wed, 2 Mar 1994 05:10:53 -0800
From: Howard Frederick <hfrederick@igc.apc.org>
Message-Id: <199403021310.FAA02089@igc.apc.org>
To: roundtable@cni.org
Subject: New Delhi Declaration
Dear Roundtablers: Please see the last two lines of this declaration
passed two weeks ago in New Delhi. They express their solidarity with
TPR and CPSR! Howard Frederick
/* Written 6:55 am Feb 23, 1994 by hfrederick@igc.apc.org in igc:list.iamcrnet */
/* ---------- "New Delhi Declaration" ---------- */
From: Howard Frederick <hfrederick@igc.apc.org>
Subject: New Delhi Declaration
[Many IAMCR members took part on this symposium in New Delhi, including
Rafael Roncagliolo, Regina Festo, Manji Pendakur, Anura Goonasekera, J.S.
Yadava, K.M. Shrivastava, Luiz Santoro, and Howard Frederick.]
>From cendit@unv.ernet.in Wed Feb 23 02:01:46 1994
Declaration of the New Delhi Symposium on New Technologies and
the Democratisation of Audiovisual Communications
New Delhi, 12 February 1994
Considering:
- that the communication and information sector has become
central in establishing the direction of social and political
change at a global level;
- that information and communications are dominated by corporate
and military interests;
- that the control of information represents a serious threat to
democracy, cultural diversity, and the evolution of civil
society;
- that an increasing number of people have come to recognise the
considerable potential social and political benefits of the
new technologies and are opposing the corporate and state
control of information and communications;
We, the participants of the Fourth International Symposium on New
Technologies and the Democratisation of Audiovisual
Communications, convened by Videazimut and CENDIT, meeting in New
Delhi on February 12, 1994, are media producers, users and
distributors, communications researchers and teachers and
representatives of many community-based and national
organisations. We have come from Australia, Bangladesh, Brazil,
Burkina Faso, Canada, Denmark, France, HongKong, India, Italy,
Japan, Kenya, Korea, Malaysia, Mozambique, Palestine,
Phillipines, Peru, Russia, Singapore, Taiwan, U.K. and U.S.A.
We, recognise and lend our support to the principles expressed by
inter alia, the UN Declaration on the Right to Development; the
UN Covenant on Civil and Political Rights; the UN Declaration on
Human Rights; the declarations from the MacBride Round Table; the
Quito Declaration.
We clearly observe that economic development in Asia and around
the world is leading to less equal distribution of resources and
wealth, and continues to exacerbate the rapid advance of
ecological devastation.
We are witness to increasing monopolisation and commercialisation
of information and the expansion of a global economy which has
led to a subversion of democratic processes and reduced popular
participation. The inability of a large part of humankind,
particularly women and indigenous cultures to exercise control
has meant their subordination to global corporate and other
vested interests.
In this context it is further apparent that as new technologies
are introduced, human dignity is diminished.
We believe in the pressing need for global democracy, not a
global supermarket, and affirm our unity in support of the
following;
1. All peoples and individuals shall have the right to
communicate freely, to utilise the tools of communication
and to inform themselves and others.
2. Airwaves and satellite paths are a global peoples resource to
be administered equitably, with a significant portion
devoted to serving the public interest and for community use.
3. We oppose the militarisation of space and the exploitation
of space for corporate interests. Any exploitation of
airwaves transmission channels and earth orbits should be
subject to a public levy to be used to support local
community expression, facilitate non-commercial information
exchange, and to contribute to equitable distribution of
information technologies.
4. Communication and information technologies must be used to
facilitate participatory democracy and the development of
civil society, not to limit democratic rights.
5. Information systems exhibit great potential for real popular
participation and should be organised according to the
principles of decentralisation in order to nurture and sustain
cultural diversity and humanitarian values.
Individuals are not born consumers; information is not a
commodity, but rather a utility to be shared. The Symposium
brought many people who have been creatively using new
technologies from the simple video camera to computer networks
and satellite transmissions to enhance democratic participation.
Such examples show that it is possible and necessary to
appropriate and liberate technology to defend ecological
struggles, to empower the disenfranchised, to express cultural
diversity, and to strengthen popular participation in genuinely
democratic processes.
In this struggle, we align ourselves with the growing movement of
local and international organisations who have spoken out in
favour of democratic communications and lend our support to the
principles expressed by them. They include Videazimut, CENDIT,
Alternative Media Asia, World Association of Community Radio
Broadcasters (AMARC), the MacBride Round Table, the Union of
Democratic Communications, the Alliance for Community Media, the
Telecommunications Policy Round Table, Computer Professionals for
Social Responsibility.