roundtable: Re: universal service and non profit amendments.... (fwd)
roundtable: Re: universal service and non profit amendments.... (fwd)
Re: universal service and non profit amendments.... (fwd)
Samuel A. Simon (ssimon@idi.net)
Tue, 29 Mar 1994 14:00:42 -0500 (EST)
Date: Tue, 29 Mar 1994 14:00:42 -0500 (EST)
From: "Samuel A. Simon" <ssimon@idi.net>
Subject: Re: universal service and non profit amendments.... (fwd)
To: roundtable@cni.org
Message-Id: <Pine.3.85.9403291442.B23730-0100000@idi.net>
Apropos of postal discounts
------------------------------------------------------------------------
Samuel A. Simon
IDI (Issue Dynamics Inc) | Internet: ssimon@idi.net
901 15th St. NW Suite 230
Washington, DC 20005
(202)408-1400 (v/tdd)
(202)408-1134 (fax)
(202)408-1163 (BBS)
------------------------------------------------------------------------
---------- Forwarded message ----------
Date: Tue, 29 Mar 1994 07:22:24 -0800 (PST)
From: Putnam Barber <pbarber@isumataq.eskimo.com>
To: usnonprofit-l@rain.org
Subject: Re: universal service and non profit amendments....
> And also, "we" have gotten rid of the nonprofit postal discount. It
> was voted out this past autumn and the phase-out will be complete by
> 1997.
This is not the way I read the recent amendments. For bulk mailings, the
ratio of the discount will be reduced somewhat, over time, but the
concept (as far as I know) remains. For periodicals, those that carry
advertising "unrelated" to the publishing organization will enjoy less
of an advantage (so small in some cases as to make the effort to use
nonprofit rates unrewarding).
The postal service does not use the same standards as the IRS in judging
eligibility for bulk rate discounts. The resulting confusion is a good
test-case for the dangers in the current effort to increase reporting of
lobbying expenses by nonprofits through applying an entirely new set of
standards (different, again, from theIRS') in that area as well. Ugh!
Putnam Barber (pbarber@eskimo.com)
Seattle