An alternative access method for the same information available from the CNI-ANNOUNCE listserv.
In their contribution to the New Years festivities, I’ve just recieved an announcement from NSF that the National Science Board has now issued a report (dated December 14, 2011) from their Task Force on Data Policies titiled “Digital Research Data Sharing and Management” and is calling for comments, with a due date of January 10, 2012.
The call for comments is here
and it includes (at least as of December 31, 2011) a bad pointer ot the report; changing this to
worked for me.
Best Wishes for the New Year.
The Berkeley Center for Law and Technology at the University of California, Berkeley is hosting a major symposium on March 12-13 to explore paths foward on the orphan works problem, particularly in light of the apparent failure of the Google Books Settlement and recent developments in Europe. Full details on the symposium and a link to registration can be found at
A few weeks ago I shared information on two calls from the US Office of Science and Technology Policy one for public comment on issues related to public access to articles produced as part of federally funded research, and the other dealing with a range of policy issues surrounding data produced as as part of federally funded research. Both had early January 2012 deadlines.
I know from conversations at the CNI fall membership meeting and other venues over the past few weeks that many CNI member institutions and many individuals that are part of the CNI community have a keen interest in one or both of these calls for comment.
I just learned that the deadline for comments has been somewhat extended, allowing those interested more time to respond to these important calls. Here is the full announcement:
My thanks to Prue Adler at the Association of Research Libraries for this pointer.
Presentation materials & handouts for many of the Fall 2011 CNI Membership Meeting breakout sessions are now available from the project briefing (presentation) pages at http://www.cni.org/mm/fall-2011/project-briefings/.
Presenters who have not done so already are asked to send their materials to firstname.lastname@example.org.
Videos from selected sessions will be available beginning in early January.
There’s a wealth of great material here, though personally the two talks that stand out in my memory (and I have not gone back and listened to the all the talks again) were those of Paul Duguid, my colleague at the UC Berkeley School of Information, and John V. Lombardi, the very blunt-spoken and provocative President of the Lousiana State University System.
The European Science Foundation’s Standing Committee on the Humanities has just issued a policy brief on Research Infrastructure in the Digital Humanities which offers an excellent survey of many large-scale European digital humanities efforts. Further details and a link to the report can be found at
A Guide to the Fall 2011
Coalition for Networked Information Membership Meeting
The Fall 2011 CNI Membership Meeting, to be held at the Crystal Gateway Marriott Hotel in Arlington, Virginia on December 12 and 13, offers a wide range of presentations that advance and report on CNI’s programs, showcase projects underway at member institutions, and highlight important national and international developments. Here is the “roadmap” to the sessions at the meeting, which includes both plenary events and an extensive series of breakout sessions focusing on current developments in digital information. As always, we have strived to present sessions that reflect late-breaking developments and also take advantage of our venue in the Washington, DC area to provide opportunities to interact with policy makers and funders.
As usual, the CNI meeting proper is preceded by an optional orientation session for new attendees-both representatives of new member organizations and new representatives or alternate delegates from existing member organizations-at 11:30 AM; guests are also welcome. Refreshments are available for all at 12:15 PM on Monday, December 12. The opening plenary is at 1:15 PM and will be followed by three rounds of parallel breakout sessions. For this meeting, we added an extra round of breakout sessions on Monday in order to take advantage of an unprecedented number of proposals for sessions; it’s clear that the pace of developments is accelerating, and we need to be responsive to this. Tuesday, December 13, includes three additional rounds of parallel breakout sessions, lunch and the closing keynote, concluding around 3:30 PM. Along with plenary and breakout sessions, the meeting includes generous break time for informal networking with colleagues and a reception which will run until 7:15 PM on Monday evening, December 12, after which participants can enjoy a wide range of dining opportunities in the Crystal City and Washington areas. Downtown Washington, DC is a quick taxi ride or accessible via the Metrorail (Metro) transit system, which is directly connected to the Crystal Gateway hotel.
The CNI meeting agenda is subject to last minute changes, particularly in the breakout sessions, and you can find the most current information on our Web site, www.cni.org, and on the announcements board near the registration desk at the meeting.
The Plenary Sessions
As is usual at our fall meetings, I have reserved the opening plenary session. I want to look at recent developments and the ways in which the landscape is changing, and to outline the developments I expect to see in the coming years. As part of this, I’ll discuss progress on the Coalition’s agenda, and highlight selected initiatives from the 2011-2012 Program Plan. The Program Plan will be distributed at the meeting (and will be available electronically on the Coalition’s Web site, www.cni.org around December 13). I look forward to sharing the Coalition’s continually evolving strategy with you, as well as discussing current issues. The opening plenary will include time for questions and discussion, and I am eager to hear your comments.
The closing plenary, scheduled to start at 2:15 PM on Tuesday, will be given by William Michener, Professor and Director of e-Science Initiatives for the Libraries of the University of New Mexico, and Principal Investigator of the National Science Foundation (NSF)-funded DataONE project.
Bill is a marine scientist by training, and has spent most of his professional career leading large, complex, multi-disciplinary and information-intensive ecological, biological and environmental science projects; you can find the details of his biography as part the plenary session descriptions for the fall meeting. I’ve had an opportunity to get to know Bill Michener a bit over the past years as part of the privilege of serving on the DataONE External Advisory Board; he is a tremendously energetic and deeply thoughtful person who is committed to advancing scholarship, and very sensitive to the changing relationships among the scientific enterprise, higher education, libraries, science funders, and the public. He’s also carefully studied successes, failures, and sustainability problems in past efforts to use technology to transform scholarly practices and cultures at scale. Bill will share his views on the new landscape of science broadly – emphasizing the earth and life sciences – and give us insight into how the DataONE project can support and facilitate these transformations.
Highlighted Breakout Sessions
I will not attempt to comprehensively summarize the wealth of breakout sessions here. However, I want to note particularly some sessions that have strong connections to the Coalition’s 2011-2012 Program Plan, as well as a few other sessions of special interest or importance, and to provide some additional context that may be helpful to attendees in making choices. We have a packed agenda of breakout sessions, and, as always, will try to put material from these sessions on our Web site following the meeting for those who were unable to attend. We will also be capturing a few sessions on video for later re-distribution.
With the imposition of the US NSF requirements for data management plans in grant proposals early in 2011, CNI’s work in data curation has reached a new level of intensity; at this meeting we can see member efforts to build common tools or services for broad deployment, as well as many exemplar or prototype campus or consortial projects and services. We are delighted to have an update from the California Digital Library and University of Virginia on the DMPTool, an institutionally-configurable tool which provides online guidance and resources to help researchers develop data management plans as part of grant proposals. We will also have an introduction to the Sustainable Digital Data Preservation and Access Network Partnership SEAD Project, funded as part of the NSF DataNet initiative, as well as the plenary update on the DataONE Datanet work. Johns Hopkins University will describe their Data Management services group, which provides proposal development and planning support to their institution’s faculty using data management and archiving systems developed by the Data Conservancy. DuraSpace’s DuraCloud Direct to the Researcher provides enhanced cloud-based storage for research data, and we will hear a report on its current status. The University of Nebraska will feature a partnership between IT and libraries for seamless data archiving.
As we develop open collections of data, we must also address their accessibility. Tufts and Harvard, with additional partners, are collaboratively developing a Web application to discover, preview, and retrieve geospatial data from a range of sites. We also need to develop systems for capturing research data, and Rutgers will describe a MODS application profile that documents the content, major lifecycle events and rights associated with research data. Two other projects focus on assisting researchers with the data lifecycle: the Smithsonian Institution is developing a virtual research environment for this purpose and the University of Idaho and partners are implementing the Northwest Knowledge Network, a regional approach to research data lifecycle management. A German project also focuses on creating a virtual research environment, WissKI, that will incorporate a range of primary sources from universities and museums and will employ semantic technologies.
We have a particularly strong set of sessions on topics related to digital preservation. David Rosenthal of Stanford, who captivated attendees in a plenary session at a 2009 CNI meeting, will discuss a model for comparing the cost of local storage with cloud storage. He has developed a framework into which models including interest rates, technology evolution and other factors can be plugged and then used to explore a wide range of scenarios; this will be of great interest to campus IT units trying to design and price long-term reliable storage services.
Cornell and Columbia, in a 2CUL study, have produced some startling and extremely important information for the library community. They will discuss their finding that only a small part of the libraries’ e-journal titles are currently being preserved by PORTICO or LOCKSS; understanding the details and implications of this will, I believe, lead to major rethinking and reprioritizing of our community’s strategies for protecting our e-journals. We will learn about major national efforts in digital preservation as reported at a conference in Estonia in May 2011 along with a report on the first year of the National Digital Stewardship Alliance, coordinated by the Library of Congress. Several sessions will address aspects of preservation for specialized collections: game preservation at the University of Illinois, executable content at Carnegie Mellon, and older reel-to-reel and cassette audio recordings at Columbia. The Florida Center for Library Automation will describe its rewritten DAITSS, a preservation repository application.
In the largest of our digital collections, while technical challenges continue to be significant, often the issues needing the most attention have to do with policies, infrastructure, governance, sustainability, collaboration, and funding. HathiTrust, a growing multi-institutional collaboration, now has a repository of nearly 10 million volumes and is developing the next stage of its partnership model as it grapples with policy and legal issues as well as setting priorities. Europeana is the major aggregator of digital library collections in Europe, and incorporates a wide range of materials, including audiovisual materials, special collections, and theses. We’ll have sessions covering both of these initiatives.
Some specialized digital collections projects in the US are developing new collaborations, such as the Open Folklore collaboration between the Indiana University Library and the American Folklore Society, and some are building new tools to enhance specialized collections, such as the Mapping Atlanta project at Emory. At Binghamton University, they are developing a repository that focuses on both born digital artifacts as well as unique research products; by using the Rosetta tool, they are enhancing discovery while providing a digital preservation methodology for university digital assets.
Some projects are focusing on more technical issues related to large collections, repositories, and digitization. Hydra assists institutions in building a robust and durable digital repository system supporting multiple collections with tailored workflows; Stanford, Virginia, and Hull were the original partners and now a dozen institutions are using the system. We will also have an update on the Exhibit software, which assists institutions in organizing, publishing, and navigating linked data on the Web; it is especially important for managing and publishing very large collections of any type of data. George Washington University is developing a cost-forecasting model for new digitization projects that employ robotic arm technology. The International Standards Organization (ISO) has recently approved a new standard against which one can assess repositories of digital content and data; we will have a report by the Center for Research Libraries on the potential benefits of this work.
There are a number of interesting developments related to information discovery, access, and retrieval. These projects are experimenting with the need to provide more sophisticated access to the wealth of digital information, whether by individuals or by machines. One central idea is that of scholars (or librarians working on their behalf) taking control of their records of publication, and using measures related to this record as a way of demonstrating the impact of scholarly work. We’ll have a session on work that Microsoft’s Academic Search is doing as an exemplar to support such efforts (though I note this is only one example of what is happening in this area, albeit an important and unusually transparent one). In related developments, Elsevier is working on machine-readable interfaces to scholarly data that are useful for scholarly content and bibliometrics. An area that has been of long-standing interest to CNI is the name management problem in the attribution of scholarship and the management of the scholarly record; this combines some of the traditional library authority work with some components of persistent identifiers, authentication, biography, bibliography and other topics. If we put a uniform author identifier system in place, it will, over time, greatly increase discoverability of the body of an author’s work, and in the work on display in the Microsoft Academic Search presentation we can see the effects of not having such a system. The ORCID initiative is currently the leading proposal for addressing this problem, and they will have a session to report on progress and invite participation from CNI attendees.
The State and University Library of Denmark and Cornell University are both developing search mechanisms that can be customized for various audiences, whether a subject specialty such as engineering or a format such as television and radio programs. Two projects will focus on specialized software to access specific types of collections: the National Library of Medicine will feature its video search tool and the University of British Columbia will describe its CONTENTdm-based interface to historical newspapers. The International Image Interoperability Framework (IIIF) is being developed by Stanford, the British Library, and other partners with the goal of providing users an unprecedented level of uniform and rich access to image based resources that currently reside in many discrete silos; this will be an opportunity to catch up on developments that I don’t think are yet widely known.
Some projects are incorporating user community participation and contribution into their systems for discovery and access, including the “What’s on the Menu?” project at the New York Public Library, which has invited the public to transcribe items in a menu collection into a structured and reusable form; we will learn about their successes and challenges. A University of Maryland project also encouraged social tagging of images by non-experts; this briefing will focus on the computational linguistic processing of the user-created metadata and on bilingual and multilingual issues in social tagging patterns.
We face a continuing need for new and better tools to illuminate user behavior. JSTOR has been amassing 15 years of log data and has been working on normalizing and organizing these data in order to understand user behavior and trends; we will have a report on this work. The Association of Research Libraries (ARL) has been working with the Ontario Council of University Libraries to assess the impact of networked electronic resources with the implementation of MINES for Libraries.
A number of sessions will provide insights into new developments related to teaching and learning and the educational process. CNI’s Joan Lippincott, along with Malcolm Brown from the EDUCAUSE Learning Initiative (ELI) and Jeanne Narum from the Learning Spaces Collaboratory (LSC), will focus on current issues and projects that address the assessment of learning spaces.
CNI has had a particular interest in programs that foster new types of literacy for the digital age. At this meeting, we have a number of sessions that address aspects of this topic. At the University of Pennsylvania and Temple, they are working with undergraduates to produce videos as course projects and seeking to understand what kinds of support and instruction are needed. McMaster University is working with a large number of students to develop their geospatial literacy skills. The University of Toronto iSchool has a certificate program in conceptual curation and pedagogy for conceptual thinking that will develop new kinds of analytical skills in future information professionals; attendees at the session will be invited to join Toronto in some collaborative work. The University of Virginia has focused some resources on moving video and audio into the scholarly mainstream. Their work, using Sakai, Drupal, and Kaltura, has been achieving success in the teaching and learning arena, and they are also working on moving media into the mainstream of scholarly communication.
Another important area in teaching and learning is the re-examination of modes of making textbooks available to students. Indiana University has launched an eText program that employs software with many of the functionalities that students have requested for digital curricular resources; we will hear an update on its implementation.
Several sessions will explore how organizational and professional roles are changing or must evolve in our current technology and institutional environments. How do we create information organizations that encourage innovation? Cornell and the University of Illinois Urbana-Champaign will challenge us to think about ideas and organizations that drive technology innovation. Virginia Tech, the University of North Texas, and the MetaArchive Cooperative will discuss their thoughts and projects related to new roles for supporting and curating digital scholarship, with some case studies as examples. The Association of College & Research Libraries will highlight findings from their recent summits that extended the work of their Value of Academic Libraries initiative; the summits included representatives who contributed perspectives from chief academic officers, senior institutional researchers, representatives from accrediting associations and higher education organizations.
We will have a session in which presenters explore overall issues related to academic and research library publishing strategies; data from a survey of ARL libraries and liberal arts colleges from the Oberlin Group will be presented. The session will also feature a specific instance of a new type of publishing venture: the Long Civil Rights Movement collaboration is a joint program of the University of North Carolina (UNC) Press, the UNC Library, and several research centers. We will hear about the usage of the collection, user behavior (including user-contributed annotations), and lessons learned.
We know our members are always interested in understanding funding opportunities for digital projects, and we will have an update session from the Institute for Museum and Library Services on their programs for 2012.
CNI was an early leader in the movement to implement electronic theses and dissertations. As this initiative has gained broader adoption, there has been concern (particularly from faculty) about whether students who provide open access to their theses and dissertations, generally via institutional repositories, will damage their prospects for publishing this work in a scholarly journal. The Networked Digital Library of Theses and Dissertations (NDLTD) 2011 publishers’ survey provides real data to challenge the assertions that an open access ETD is generally considered to constitute prior publication. This will be of interest to the many CNI institutions planning or managing an ETD program.
There is much more, and I invite you to browse the complete list of breakout sessions and their full abstracts at the CNI Web site. In many cases you will find these abstracts include pointers to reference material that you may find useful to explore prior to the session, and after the meeting we will add material from the actual presentations, including selected video recordings, when they available to us. You can also follow the meeting via Twitter, using the hashtag #cni11f.
I look forward to seeing you in Arlington, Virginia this December for what promises to be another extremely worthwhile meeting. Please contact me (email@example.com), or Joan Lippincott, CNI’s Associate Director (firstname.lastname@example.org) if we can provide you with any additional information on the meeting.
Last fall, I shared with the CNI-announce community a call for short papers issued by the Social, Behavioral and Economic Sciences Directorate of the US National Science Foundation as part of an unusual effort to identify new research opportunities in the ten to twenty year time horizon so that they could be factored into NSF’s programs. Clearly, data and computationally intensive research methods are an important part of this environment, as are social media and the new collections of evidence created by extensive use of digital technology in society.
The submitted papers became available some time ago, and we did a breakout on this at the CNI member meeting last Fall. NSF has now produced a final synthesizing report on the project, titled “Rebuilding the Mosaic” which is available for downloading, and set up a page that integrates all the material. This can be found at:
There is also a press release with pointers to some related video materials at
The December 2, 2011 issue of Science Magazine has a series of interesting articles about the reproducibility and replicability of results in scientific research, an important driver in many of the current conversations about data management and curation in science. See
Note that some of the material requires licensed access.
Updates on issues ranging from open data to innovations in publishing to assessment are some of the topics covered in the latest report from CNI, the Nov. 28, 2011 installment of CNI Conversations.
Director Clifford Lynch reports on the US Office of Science & Technology Calls for Comment on open data and open publications, as well a recent paper by the European Knowledge Exchange on an action plan for research data. CNI’s associate director Joan Lippincott summarizes the Berlin 9 meeting on open access, and she discusses assessment in higher education. Upcoming meetings of interest to the community are also highlighted.
For more information about the Nov. 28 CNI Conversations, and to listen, go to http://wp.me/p1LncT-1NK