Association of Research Libraries; <http://www.arl.org/>EDUCAUSE; <http://www.educause.edu/>
   
CNI - Coalition for Networked Information; <http://www.cni.org/>
 
About CNI
Task Force Meetings
Conferences
Presentations and Publications
Projects
CNI Collaborations
Site Map
Google

www.cni.org
the web

Information about CNI RSS news feed.

 

Assessing the Academic Networked Environment

Brown University


    CNI Planning - Instructional Support

    Name: Instructional Contacts - Requests
    Type: Improvement and Extensiveness

    Brief Description:

      Number of faculty requests to CIS_Faculty_Liaison for services, including:
        - room requests (included those scheduled by registrar)
        - network services (newsgroups/course accounts)
        - training requests

    How Gathered:

      Through the Faculty Request form,
      the Course Publisher requests, and
      ad-hoc queries via e-mail and phone.

    How Analyzed:

      Compare courses requesting instructional support to:
        departmental course offerings (if possible)
        enrolled students

      Computer room usage by:

        hours/week
        number of courses scheduled
        hours/course

      Formal requests versus ad-hoc requests
      Request date compared with time to fill

        By official request deadline,
        1 month before classes
        1 week before classes
        1st two weeks of classes
        After second week

      Purpose:

        To understand service demands by group (department) and function (specialized software etc.) to tailor and improve service levels to departments.

      Value:

        Assist with planning workflow and staffing requirements.
        Establish benchmarks for quality of service.
        Assists with understanding how users understand services and integration. with instructional delivery.


    Name: Instructional Contacts - Specialized Software
    Type: Improvement and Effectiveness

    Brief Description:

      Number of requests for specialized software (defined as software used by that course or department alone, ex: Populus for BioMed).

    How Gathered:

      Faculty database and ad-hoc requests.

    How analyzed:

      Longitudinal analysis for trends.

    Purpose:

      To better understand the balance between general purpose software and specialized software.

    Value:

      Impact on support levels and possible budget justification.


    Name: Instructional Contacts - Breakdowns
    Type: Improvement and Efficiency

    Brief Description:

      Numbers of faculty contacts which require follow-up with instructional team to complete request.

    How Gathered:

      Service providers with faculty contact - Manger of Instructional Support, Faculty Liaison, Facilities Manger, Training - maintain e-mail logs for start of semester.

    How analyzed:

      Compare with requests which are met without intervention.

    Purpose:

      Determine adequacy of procedures and documentation.

    Value:

      Redesign services to meet user needs.


    Name: Instructional Uses - Services
    Type: Improvement and Effectiveness

    Brief Description:

      Use of services over the academic cycle of the semester or year, including:
        newsgroups
        web (CP)
        classrooms
        clusters

    How Gathered:

      Newsgroups - by examining numbers and dates of postings Web/CP - examining course listings for web pages* Classrooms - examine schedules Clusters - note times when full; implement network-based measurements How analyzed: Trends and cycle times.

    Purpose:

      Determine which requested services are in use.

    Value:

      Provide justification for offerings to integrate technology into teaching and to examine whether requests services are in fact being used.

    Note: Mark Handler might have some ideas regarding web services and Course Publisher evaluation.


    Name: Instructional Needs
    Type: Improvement and Extensiveness

    Brief Description:

      Meet with users to ask, "What do you want?". The current method seems to be provide what we think is best.

    How Gathered:

      Meet with departments and coordination with Library and Dept.Consulting.

    How analyzed:

      Recommendation reports.

    Purpose:

      Determine what are the important services and delivery means.

    Value:

      Help CIS provide services with biggest bang to users rather than to demanding users. Help uncover barriers to use.



[Backward] [To Index] [Forward] [CNI Home Page]