California State University
Dr. Gordon Smith
Senior Associate, Information Technology
Policy and Analysis
Office of the Chancellor
A. Introduction
The libraries of the California State University produced in 1994 a
comprehensive strategic plan designed to prepare for the educational
and information environments anticipated for the 21st Century. That
plan, titled Transforming CSU Libraries for the 21st Century,
identified as its first and foremost strategy a system of linking and
integrating for easy access the full range of information resources
available in all the CSU and other libraries as well as resources of
the Internet. CSU libraries were facing frozen or declining budgets
combined with prodigious increases in the rate
of publication and in access methods to
the expanding information cosmos. A new and innovative use of
technology was seen as necessary to leverage the size of the
CSU and its existing information resources in order to continue
to meet the information needs of students and faculty.
The Unified Information Access System (UIAS) initiative that arose from
this strategic planning responds to a vision for the 21st Century that
assumes that CSU students and faculty will interact with each other and
with information using pervasive technology that will enable every student
and every faculty member to access, retrieve, display, and manipulate a
vast array of recorded knowledge and information. The barriers of
space -- physical location of student, faculty member, or
information -- are expected to disappear, as well as the barrier of time.
In this vision, the 21st Century CSU campus library will be the hub
of a full-service information and instruction network designed to
facilitate the delivery and use of recorded knowledge and information.
This transformation is expected to change teaching, styles of learning,
and modes of scholarly communication in response to a rapidly changing
educational environment and an increasingly diverse student population.
Using the services offered by the CSU libraries, every student will be
able to take full advantage of the electronic information age without
regard to background or economic status.
B. Problem Statement
The Institution
With 340,000 students, more than 37,000 faculty, and two million alumni,
the California State University is the largest system of senior higher
education in the country. It is comprised of 23 campuses and six off
campus centers throughout the state. As measured by several dimensions,
it is one of the most diverse systems as well. Campuses range in size
from 400 students at the California Maritime Academy to 30,000 students
at San Diego State University. Campuses are both rural and urban,
commuter and residential. Two campuses are polytechnics, and one, CSU
Monterey Bay, recently opened as a converted army base.
Diversity also characterizes the student population. More than a third
of CSU's students are working adults who attend part time. The average
age of undergraduates is 24.6 years. Ethnic diversity is high; students
from non-white groups comprise roughly 50 percent of CSU's enrollment. The
latter trend is upwards as evidenced by comparison with the non-white
enrollment of 28 percent in 1984.
The CSU is governed by a board of trustees and a systemwide administration
in the Office of the Chancellor. Despite appearances, however, academic
and fiscal decision making is highly decentralized. Presidents have been
granted both authority and accountability for carrying out the mission of
their institutions within the budget allocated by the trustees. In this
climate of campus autonomy, systemwide cooperative initiatives must
demonstrate clear benefits to each individual campus; participation,
for the most part, is voluntary.
Despite campus autonomy and diversity in academic cultures, CSU libraries
have a long tradition of cooperation. That tradition made possible the
development of the 1994 strategic plan which set forth a common vision
and specific strategies in five goal areas: information resources,
instruction, human resources, infrastructure, administration and
funding. The Unified Information Access System initiative is the
principle strategy of the information resources goal area.
The Situation
CSU libraries must increasingly rely on alternatives to traditional
ownership of information resources to meet the needs of students and
faculty. Limited acquisitions budgets combined with staggering price
increases over the last several years have resulted in massive serial
cancellation projects. By the mid-1990s, CSU libraries had been forced
to cancel collectively over 15,000 periodical and serial subscriptions.
Purchases of books dropped from 460,000 in 1987 to 320,000 in 1996, this
despite a steady increase in titles published during that period.
The ever-increasing complexity of the information environment has
exacerbated the pressure on library budgets as well. In addition
to straining to retain essential subscriptions and acquire important
books, CSU libraries have had to respond to demands for access to
expensive bibliographic and full-text databases such as LEXIS-NEXIS.
Rather than supplanting the older information formats, new and emerging
resources must be added to the library's array of existing resources;
acquisition and access costs expand rather than shift.
The explosion in sources of information, dramatically illustrated by
the World Wide Web in particular, has also strained the library's
educational and public service capabilities. Librarians struggle
to help students make sense of the vast array of resources, an effort
made more difficult by the increasing tendency of students to do their
research online without ever setting foot in a library or asking for
guidance from a librarian. Librarians are scrambling to develop
programs of instruction in information competence to equip students
with the skills to select, obtain, evaluate and use information.
Finally, the demographic changes of the student population in
California, and the CSU's planned response to those changes,
are an important component of the situation facing its libraries.
Not only will libraries be required to serve students with
increasingly diverse backgrounds and learning styles, they will be
forced to accommodate a change in the basic means of delivery of
higher education. By the year 2005, CSU is projected to enroll
at least 70,000 more students than it does today. With no funding
expected to build or expand campuses capable of handling such growth,
the CSU will increasingly rely on educational and information technologies
to create a "distributed" learning environment for its students. Libraries
will face the challenge of delivering library services and instruction to
students who may never visit a campus.
Strategic Significance
The situation described above, and CSU libraries' response to it, presents
a model for voluntary collaboration by a large number of campuses in
applying information technology through strategic planning. In the
process of crafting a strategy, library administrators and Chancellor's
Office staff worked through the natural tension between centralization
and campus autonomy to find the right balance to permit development of
a cohesive approach to responding to overwhelming change.
Another element of significance is the innovative nature of the approach
sought by the libraries. Several pieces of the overall unified access
system envisioned had been developed and implemented at other institutions,
but none had yet achieved the full range of functionality seen as needed
to respond to the CSU's situation. This proved to be significant when
approaching vendors as candidates for partnering, and it proved significant
when seeking funding from the CSU system. Applications of technology seen
as creative and "leading edge" are of considerably more interest to top
administrators and to vendors seeking new products to market than are
traditional solutions.
On a more fundamental level of strategic significance, the application
of technology through the UIAS will leverage the combined information
and professional staff resources of 22 libraries to provide a higher
level of service than would be possible if each continued to function separately.
Objectives: Desired Outcomes
The Unified Information Access System project seeks to develop a dynamic and
comprehensive tool for student access to information resources, for resource
sharing among libraries, and for guidance and instruction in navigating the
complexities of the expanding information environment. The UIAS is defined
as a single, easy to use, integrated, and coherent computer-based user
interface which provides direct online access to or delivery of:
- print resources described in CSU Libraries' Online Public Access Catalogs and described in catalogs of libraries beyond CSU;
- print resources described in other bibliographic/abstract databases such as periodical indices;
- digital resources, including text, image, video, and multi-media;
- Internet-based resources including those on the World-Wide Web;
- guidance in the use and evaluation of information resources including access to self-paced information competence instruction.
The UIAS will be dynamic both in its ability to respond to the rapidly
changing information environment and in its ability to respond to the
needs of the individual student. Students and faculty will access
the UIAS via a standard Web browser such as Netscape Navigator or Internet
Explorer. The browser client software will be linked by the UIAS gateway
server on each campus to the library's patron datafile. This linkage
will not only provide authorization for users accessing licensed databases,
but will also permit librarians to customize the interface for different
categories of users. A faculty member, for example, could be presented a
sequence of screens entirely different from one designed for a lower
division undergraduate.
In summary, the desired outcome of the UIAS project is the creation of
a powerful information access and educational tool that can meet the
academic information needs of CSU students and faculty, a tool that
is available anytime and any place. A detailed description of the
functionality and architecture of the UIAS, as well as its current
status, can be found at the project Web site
http://uias.calstate.edu/.
C. The Approach
Financial Resources
Funding for the development and first year of operation of the UIAS
is being allocated from a systemwide fund for strategic initiatives.
The project has been accorded high priority as a key component of CSU's
overall effort in employing information technology to enhance educational
quality and access; UIAS is critical to achieving the distributed learning
environment described earlier.
Beginning with the fourth year of the project, campus libraries will be
assessed to support ongoing operating costs for the UIAS. Hardware and
software maintenance are the primary components of these costs. The UIAS
thus reflects an overall CSU approach to funding information technology
projects which restricts systemwide funding to "seeding" or start up only.
Ongoing control and support of projects, even those of a systemwide nature,
becomes decentralized and the responsibility of campuses rather than the
system's central office.
Human Resources
The human resources devoted to the UIAS consist of a mix of systemwide
and campus personnel. General oversight and decision making is provided
by a management team drawn from campus library directors and systemwide
staff. A temporary, full-time position of project manager was created
for the project's development phase.
The project manager's responsibilities include serving as the point of
contact between the CSU and the library automation firm retained to
provide the hardware and software of the UIAS. This area of responsibility
is particularly critical to the success of the project given the nature of
the contractual relationship with the vendor. CSU and the vendor have
established a collaborative or partnering relationship to enable development
of an altogether new approach to information access.
Equally important to the project is the involvement of the librarians and
support staff of the twenty-two CSU libraries. Their participation in the
development of the UIAS is important both to ensure a smooth and successful
implementation in each library, and to ensure that the project benefits from
their collective talent and experience. To that end, five systemwide task
forces have been established to focus on particular aspects of the UIAS. Each
task force is comprised of six to eight library staff selected for their
expertise. These task forces combine to form a "virtual organization" for
staffing the UIAS project; avoided is the necessity of creating and funding
a large number of system-level positions.
Finally, recognizing the complexity of the UIAS and the size of the CSU
library community, the project management team has established means of
communication and involvement for library personnel not formally assigned
to a task force. These include several reflector lists and opportunities
for "affiliate" involvement with task forces.
Policies and Practices
A central principle underlying the development of systemwide information
technology projects in the CSU-- including the UIAS-- is that campus
participation is a matter of choice rather than a dictate of policy from
the central administration. That is to say, unless the case can be made
that it is to the benefit of every campus to participate, every individual
campus cannot be expected to join. That principle has resulted in a mix of
both "multi-campus" projects as well as all-inclusive systemwide projects.
Some projects, moreover, may shift from multi-campus to systemwide as
satisfactory results are demonstrated.
In the case of UIAS, because it originated from a strategic planning
process designed to capitalize on the collective resources of all the
CSU libraries, it was seen as systemwide from the outset. Individual
libraries will, however, be accorded considerable flexibility in how
the UIAS is actually integrated into their existing information systems
and interlibrary loan operations. The extent to which a library permits
unmediated patron-initiated intercampus borrowing, for example, will be
a local decision. Another local decision will involve how the UIAS
interface will be integrated into the existing online public access
catalog. Some campuses may offer UIAS as the primary interface into
information resources, while other may choose to make it a second-level
option.
The important point to be made regarding policies and practices is
that the UIAS has the potential for dramatically changing the way
students, faculty and staff access information resources and how
resources are shared among libraries. A carefully designed process
of systemwide consultation, pilot testing, and staff training is
necessary if local library practices are to be successfully adjusted
to accommodate the UIAS. Each CSU library possesses its own unique
culture and blend of human and information resources; to succeed, the
project must be guided with a sensitivity to that uniqueness.
Technology Resources
The Unified Information Access System is built on an infrastructure of
standards: international, national, industry, de facto and emerging.
Integrating software and hardware from companies, often competing in
similar markets, provides an unprecedented level of interoperability
that will benefit the UIAS user. At its heart the UIAS utilizes
distributed databases for authentication, authorization and the
discovery and delivery of information tailored to the needs of
CSU faculty, staff and students. To the users, the UIAS is an
application that rides on TCP/IP, HTTP/HTML, Z39.50, Z39.81, ISO
10161, SQL , US MARC ODBC, LDAP, UNIX, NT and, potentially, 3M's SIP2.
Being a distributed system, the UIAS depends on robust and continuously
available networks. CSUNet, CSU's high speed dedicated network links
its 22 campuses and serves as CSU's Internet Service Provider. This
ATM and router-based telecommunications network is upgraded regularly
to meet the growing demand for access to high speed networking services
for a full range of digital and analog instructional and administrative
applications.
CSU will be integrating software using some of the newest protocols,
such as ISO 10161, with software using standards and protocols that
became widely implemented during the early and mid 1990s. Providing
interoperability with legacy systems has facilitated the rapid prototyping
of the UIAS.
The development of the UIAS has been and will continue to be on the edge
of trends in the library automation marketplace, the digital library
initiatives, the World Wide Web, and the database market. Selecting
the software and standards available in these sometimes parallel,
sometimes intersecting development arenas is what defines, while
continually reinvigorating, the UIAS vision and model. The UIAS aspires
to integrate the best practices in the information technology domain and
apply them to the problem of information discovery and retrieval in a
large scale distributed learning context.
Mix and Balance of Resources
Implementing the UIAS project requires a mix of both campus and systemwide
resources, in both the human and technology categories. Startup funding
and project management is provided by the system; project oversight and
technical guidance is provided by campus library staff. The union catalog
and campus gateway servers and the intercampus networking infrastructure are
provided from systemwide funds; workstations to access the UIAS are provided
from campus funds.
This mix of resources reflects the overall approach of the CSU system to
implementing technology projects alluded to earlier. Systemwide resources
are used for facilitation and support of collaborative projects which
originate from the decision of individual campuses to join forces.
"Ownership" of such projects resides with the campuses who are thus
disposed to contributing staff and funding to ensure their success.
The collaborative process of developing a comprehensive strategic plan
for CSU libraries was the key to achieving the appropriate mix and
balance of resources for the UIAS. Every campus library participated
in the planning process, and consensus was reached on each goal and
objective. The process was facilitated, but not directed, by the
systemwide office. As a general observation, any complex institution
seeking to build on the collective strength of its organizational
components to develop an information strategy would be well advised
to first pursue a formal process of strategic planning.
E. The Results
Benefits / Successes
The most notable accomplishment of the UIAS project has been the creation
and refinement of a vision for greatly improving access to information
resources within a large and complex institution. From its inception,
the UIAS was recognized as ambitiously pushing the boundaries of existing
technology; its success within the proposed timeline was by no means
guaranteed. Despite that level of uncertainty and risk, the vision of
creating a unified system of information access customized to the
individual user has been compelling enough to bring together for a
common purpose a large and diverse population of library faculty and
administrators.
The UIAS vision was also compelling enough to garner a significant funding
commitment from the CSU system, and to attract virtually every major library
automation vendor to participate in a request for proposal process completed
in the spring of 1997. The culmination of that process was the execution of
a contract with Ameritech Library Services for a developmental partnership
with the CSU to achieve the full range of UIAS features.
As of this writing, seven months into the contract with Ameritech Library
Services, progress toward achieving the objectives of the project has been
mixed. The CSU and Ameritech have succeeded in working through several
critical technical issues underlying the operation of the UIAS, and the basic
functionality is still scheduled for systemwide implementation in fall 1998.
Progress toward development of some key software elements has however
been slower than anticipated, the result of which is delay in implementing
the UIAS pilot installations originally scheduled for winter 1997.
Failures
The single greatest failure of the project to date has involved the
nature of the relationship between the CSU project team and the contractor,
Ameritech Library Services. The complexity of the UIAS project,
particularly the number of innovative functional elements requiring design,
development and testing, has posed challenges in communication and coordination
between the CSU and Ameritech. The vision of the UIAS has been difficult to
translate within a corporate organization accustomed to thinking in terms of
existing product lines and software modules. The result of the failure to
anticipate this difficulty has been unforeseen delays in contract deliverables
and the need to adjust expectations within the CSU libraries.
Unintended Consequences
A significant, and very positive, unintended consequence of pursuing UIAS
as a systemwide information strategy has been its evolution from primarily
an information access tool to a conception of it as a foundation upon which
CSU libraries can collaborate to build new models of cooperative acquisitions,
management of access to resources, and personalized interactive guidance in
the use of ever-expanding information resources. An outline describing this
broader conception can be found under "Dimensions" on the project home page
cited earlier.
As the UIAS is implemented around the CSU, it is anticipated that this
creative process will continue as library staff explore the potential of
a gateway to the information environment that can be customized to the
needs and circumstances of the individual user.
F. Lessons Learned
Advice to Others
Institutions pursuing a comprehensive information strategy would be advised
to involve as much of their organizations as possible in "thinking big,"
allowing creativity to flow within a structured process of strategic
planning tailored to the institution. Once the organization is unified
behind a vision, issues of resource limitations and policies and practices
are much more easily resolved. This approach is especially important in
an organization the size of the CSU, where the potential benefits of
collaboration are enormous, but where the potential for fractiousness
is enormous as well.
Employing an outside vendor to assist in achieving that unified vision, as
the CSU has, creates it own set of issues. Every effort must be made to
ensure that the key players in the vendor's organization fully understand
and share that vision, and that the terms and conditions of any contract
spell out a realistic path toward achieving it. The vision needs constant
reinforcement as the project moves ahead and the players change within both
organizations.
Finally, in the case of a developmental partnership with a vendor, the risk
of failure must be shared by both parties, and the benefits of success to
each should be clearly understood. The potential benefits of thinking
beyond existing approaches in both organizations must be continually
reinforced at all levels, executive as well as staff.
Advice to Self -- Plans for Change
There are two aspects of the UIAS project which, in retrospect, should have
been handled differently, and which CSU intends to change as the project
progresses. One is the way the project team has communicated with the
vendor/partner; the other is way the team has dealt with the expectations
of the CSU library community.
Organizational changes within Ameritech Library Services during the first
several months of the UIAS contract created difficulties for the project
team; progress has been slowed by the inevitable discontinuities such
changes produce. The project team is now working more closely with both
the executive and development level personnel at Ameritech to set realistic
timelines for deliverables focused on implementing UIAS on schedule.
Expectation management within the CSU libraries is another area requiring
more careful attention by the project team. The project team intends to
more clearly convey to the library community specifics of what UIAS will
do at start up, and when additional features are likely to be available.
The potential of UIAS has generated a great deal of enthusiasm among CSU
library staff, but that enthusiasm must be tempered with the realities of
UIAS as an evolving educational resource, not a system that will at once
turn on the full range of functionality envisioned for it.