<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>CNI: Coalition for Networked Information&#187; scholarly communication</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.cni.org/tag/scholarly-communication-6/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.cni.org</link>
	<description>CNI: Coalition for Networked Information</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 02 Oct 2013 21:12:17 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en-US</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	
		<item>
		<title>Final Report on CSHE/Mellon Study on Faculty Practices in Scholarly Communication</title>
		<link>http://www.cni.org/news/final-report-on-cshemellon-study-on-faculty-practices-in-scholarly-communication/</link>
		<comments>http://www.cni.org/news/final-report-on-cshemellon-study-on-faculty-practices-in-scholarly-communication/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 29 Jan 2010 21:31:12 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>joan</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[CNI News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[scholarly communication]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://news.cni.org/?p=417</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<p>The Center for the Study of Higher Education at the University of California, Berkeley, with support from the Andrew W. Mellon Foundation, has been conducting a major multi-year study of how faculty needs and research practices shape their choices about scholarly communication. The final report on this work, <em>Assessing the Future Landscape of Scholarly Communication: </em>&#8230;</p>]]></description>
				<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The Center for the Study of Higher Education at the University of California, Berkeley, with support from the Andrew W. Mellon Foundation, has been conducting a major multi-year study of how faculty needs and research practices shape their choices about scholarly communication. The final report on this work, <em>Assessing the Future Landscape of Scholarly Communication: An Exploration of Faculty Values and Needs in Seven Disciplines</em> is now available at <a href="http://escholarship.org/uc/cshe_fsc">http://escholarship.org/uc/cshe_fsc</a>. This is a very important look at where faculty thinking and practice stands in regard to the changing scholarly communication environment, including a  sensitive examination of differences across disciplines. Updates on this work have been presented at some CNI membership meetings; we hope to be able to host a report on this most current work in the near future.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.cni.org/news/final-report-on-cshemellon-study-on-faculty-practices-in-scholarly-communication/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>