<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>CNI: Coalition for Networked Information&#187; scientific collections</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.cni.org/tag/scientific-collections/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.cni.org</link>
	<description>CNI: Coalition for Networked Information</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 02 Oct 2013 21:12:17 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en-US</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	
		<item>
		<title>Surveys of US Scientific Collections</title>
		<link>http://www.cni.org/news/surveys-of-us-scientific-collections/</link>
		<comments>http://www.cni.org/news/surveys-of-us-scientific-collections/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 01 Apr 2010 00:31:15 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>joan</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[CNI News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[scientific collections]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://news.cni.org/2010/03/31/surveys-of-us-scientific-collections/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<p>Over the past few years the US Government has carried out several surveys of scientific collections and produced two very interesting reports that give a sense of the extent and diversity, as well as the scientific importance, of these resources. The first report is a survey of Federal Scientific Collections and can be found in &#8230;</p>]]></description>
				<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Over the past few years the US Government has carried out several surveys of scientific collections and produced two very interesting reports that give a sense of the extent and diversity, as well as the scientific importance, of these resources. The first report is a survey of Federal Scientific Collections and can be found in the 2008 Archives of the White House Office of Science and Technology Policy (<a href="http://www.whitehouse.gov/administration/eop/ostp/nstc/docsreports/archives">http://www.whitehouse.gov/administration/eop/ostp/nstc/docsreports/archives</a>) at:</p>
<p><a href="http://www.whitehouse.gov/galleries/NSTC%20Reports/Revision_1-22_09_CL.pdf">http://www.whitehouse.gov/galleries/NSTC%20Reports/Revision_1-22_09_CL.pdf</a></p>
<p>The second report, which is based on an NSF survey, looks at collections that receive Federal Funding; about two thirds of those described in the report are affiliated with higher education collections. This report can be found at</p>
<p><a href="http://www.nsf.gov/pubs/2009/nsf09044/nsf09044.pdf">http://www.nsf.gov/pubs/2009/nsf09044/nsf09044.pdf</a></p>
<p>Note that this NSF report is a short summary, and at the end it gives a URL to much more extensive data gathered from the survey.</p>
<p>These reports are important not just as baseline data about these collections, but because they lay part of the groundwork for a flurry of discussion and activity that is now taking place about capturing digitial representations various parts of these collections, and linking them together into national and international resources. I&#8217;ll be sharing out pointers to some of these developments in coming months, and I also hope that we&#8217;ll be able to highlight some of them at upcoming CNI meetings.</p>
<p>Clifford Lynch<br />
Director, CNI</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.cni.org/news/surveys-of-us-scientific-collections/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>