|
Internet2 Middleware Initiative: Early Harvests and Second Cuttings
|
|
Ken Klingenstein
Project Manager, Internet2 Middleware Initiative, Chief Technologist,
University of Colorado, Boulder
|
|
|
There is growing awareness of the need for a second layer of
national infrastructure for higher education and research,
focused on identifiers, authentication, directories, and
authorization. A number of efforts in this area are beginning
to produce the building blocks of this middleware
infrastructure. This session will review recent developments
and next steps in the construction of an information and
trust fabric within our community.
|
|
|
|
|
|
E-book Standards Update
|
|
Len Kawell
President
Glassbook, Inc.
|
|
|
Electronic books (e-books) have become a hot topic of
discussion during the last year. There are a number of
different companies introducing e-book products and
systems. However, without open industry-wide standards,
e-books may not become the huge success they deserve to
be. This project briefing is about the progress we have made
over the last year on e-book standards, including the content
standards OEB and PDF, the rights language standard
DPRL, and the copyright and distribution standard EBX.
The session will describe how these standards apply both to
the sale of e-books from commercial entities as well as
lending of books by libraries.
|
|
|
|
|
|
BioOne: Collaborating in Scientific Publishing
|
|
Julia Blixrud
Assistant Director, Public Programs
SPARC
|
Adrian Alexander
Executive Director
Big 12 Plus Libraries Consortium
|
|
|
Beth Warner
Assistant to the Vice Chancellor for Information Services
University of Kansas
|
|
|
BioOne is the result of an innovative collaboration between
scientific societies, academe, and the commercial sector and
will bring to the Web a uniquely valuable aggregation of the
full-texts of high-impact bioscience research journals. It is
being developed and offered as a non-profit venture through
the combined efforts of: SPARC (the Scholarly Publishing &
Academic Resources Coalition), the American Institute of
Biological Sciences (AIBS), the Big 12 Plus Libraries
Consortium, the University of Kansas, and Allen Press.
Included in BioOne will be self-published titles previously
available only in printed form by small, specialized scientific
societies. The titles will be fully encoded using a standards-
based SGML DTD for searching and archival purposes and
the database will offer cross-journal searches and inter-
journal linking from references. HTML and PDF formats
will be provided for convenient common browser viewing
and printing.
The collaboration among the public and private
organizations creating and developing BioOne is a new
model for scientific societies, universities, libraries, and
publishers, and represents a new approach to service,
design, features, cost, and terms of use for publishers,
subscribers and end-users.
|
|
|
|
handout
(in PDF format) 32K file size
|
|
UCITA
|
|
Prue Adler
Assistant Executive Director - Federal Relations and Information Policy
Association of Research Libraries
|
Rick Weingarten
Director, Office for Information Technology Policy
American Library Association
|
|
|
The Uniform Computer Information Transaction Act or UCITA, a
proposed "uniform law," will be considered by many state legislatures in
the months ahead. The goal of UCITA is to harmonize the law regarding
computer information transactions. UCITA is very broad in scope and is
applicable to everything from copyrighted expression to patents to online
databases. Because colleges, universities, libraries, and businesses rely
upon computer technologies, UCITA will, if passed in a state, affect
every facet of operations from payroll processing to terms and conditions
for licensing of online databases. This highly controversial proposal has
been significantly critiqued and/or opposed by many in the commercial
and not-for-profit sectors including insurance companies, consumer
groups, the Association of Computing Machinery, the Federal Trade
Commission, the library community, 25 attorney generals, and more.
Supporters of UCITA include large software companies such as
Microsoft and associations such as the Association of American
Publishers. A brief review of key concerns with UCITA will be provided
followed by a discussion of the implications of the proposed law for the
library and education communities.
|
|
|
|
handout
(in PDF format) 115K file size
|
|
Citation Linking for Electronic Journal Articles
|
|
Dale Flecker
Associate Director for Planning and Systems
Harvard University Library
|
Priscilla Caplan
Assistant Director for Digital Library Systems
Florida Center for Library Automation
|
|
|
One of the great promises of electronic journals is the ability
to link from a citation (in a citation database, in the
references of another article, etc.) directly to the article itself,
allowing the user immediate access to cited material.
However, there are a number of difficulties involved in
creating a robust system of links in an environment where
articles are served from a large number of systems operated
by independent organizations. In a series of meetings over
the past year various architectural models for citation
linking have been explored, and a general model articulated.
One of the unsolved problems in the model is how to ensure
the user finds the most appropriate copy or copies of an
article when it is available from more than one source. In
this session we will present for discussion both a general
linking model and some alternatives for approaching the
"appropriate copy" problem.
|
|
|
|
Download Priscilla Caplan's PPT File
|
|
Usability Testing: How to Analyze Your WebPac
|
|
Nicole Campbell
Reference Librarian
Washington State University
|
Karen R. Diller
Assistant Campus Librarian
Washington State University
|
|
|
Over the past two years, four librarians at the Pullman and
Vancouver campuses of Washington State University (WSU)
have spearheaded usability testing of the Libraries' WebPac
and Web sites. They wanted to make more informed
decisions about how to design their WebPac, how to
organize their Web sites and what information should be
available on their libraries' sites. Since the Libraries had
limited staff time and budget to spend on usability testing,
the librarians working on this project sorted through various
testing methodologies to find ones that were simple, time
efficient and would involve little cost. They decided to use a
combination of five methods: task-based testing, card
sorting, category membership expectation, an online user
survey and a short print survey. This session will cover the
planning and development of the usability testing projects,
an analysis of what worked and what did not and the
implementation of test results.
|
|
|
|
handout
(in PDF format) 56K file size
|