CNI: Coalition for Networked Information

  • About CNI
    • Membership
    • CNI Collaborations
    • Staff
    • Steering Committee
    • CNI Awards
    • History
    • CNI News
  • Program Plan
    • Current Program Plan
    • Program Plan Archive
  • Topics
  • Events & Projects
    • Membership Meetings
    • Workshops & Projects
    • Other Events
    • Event Calendar
  • Resources
    • Publications by CNI Staff
    • Program Plan
    • Pre-Recorded Project Briefing Series
    • Videos & Podcasts
    • Follow CNI
    • Historical Resources
  • Contact Us

How Much Does $1.7 Billion Buy You? A Comparison of Published Scientific Journal Articles to Their Pre-print Version

Home / Topics / Assessment / How Much Does $1.7 Billion Buy You? A Comparison of Published Scientific Journal Articles to Their Pre-print Version

November 19, 2015

Sharon Farb
Associate University Librarian, Collection Management and Scholarly Communications
University of California, Los Angeles

Todd Grappone
Associate University Librarian Digital Initiatives and Information Technology
University of California, Los Angeles

Peter Broadwell
Academic Project Development
University of California, Los Angeles

Martin Klein
Programmer/Analyst
University of California, Los Angeles

Academic publishers claim that they add value to scholarly communications primarily by coordinating reviews and contributing text during publication. These contributions come at a considerable cost: U.S. academic libraries paid $1.7 billion for serial subscriptions in 2008 alone and this number continues to rise.

Library budgets, in contrast, are flat at best and not increasing at anywhere near the same rate. Several institutions have therefore discontinued or significantly scaled back their subscription agreements with commercial publishers such as Elsevier and Wiley-Blackwell. At the University of California, Los Angeles (UCLA), we have investigated the publishers’ value proposition by conducting a comparative study of pre-print papers and their post-print counterparts. We have two working assumptions: 1) if the publishers’ argument is valid, the text of a pre-print paper should vary significantly from its corresponding post-print version, and, 2) by applying standard similarity measures, we should be able to detect and quantify such differences. In this talk we present our preliminary results based on pre-print publications from arXiv.org and their post-print counterparts obtained through subscriptions held by the UCLA Library. After matching papers via their digital object identifiers (DOIs), we applied comparative analytics and evaluated the textual similarities of components such as the title, abstract, and body. The results of our assessment suggest that the vast majority of post-print papers are largely indistinguishable from their pre-print versions. These findings contribute empirical indicators to discussions of the value that academic publishers add to scholarly communication and therefore can influence libraries’ economic decisions regarding access to scholarly publications.

http://bit.ly/arXompare
http://nces.ed.gov/pubs2010/2010348/tables/table_10.asp

Presentation (Farb)

Share this:

  • Click to share on Facebook (Opens in new window)
  • Click to share on Twitter (Opens in new window)
  • Click to share on LinkedIn (Opens in new window)

Filed Under: Assessment, CNI Fall 2015 Project Briefings, Economic Models, Project Briefing Pages, Publishing
Tagged With: cni2015fall, Project Briefings & Plenary Sessions, Videos

Last updated:  Friday, July 15th, 2022

 

Contact Us

21 Dupont Circle
Suite 800
Washington, DC, 20036
202.296.5098

Contact us
Copyright © 2023 CNI

  • Copyright Policy
  • Privacy Policy
  • Site map

Keeping up with CNI

CNI-ANNOUNCE is a low-volume electronic forum used for information about the activities and programs of CNI, and events and documents of interest to the CNI community.
Sign up

Follow CNI

  • View cni.org’s profile on Facebook
  • View cni_org’s profile on Twitter
  • LinkedIn
  • YouTube
  • Vimeo

A joint project